Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Week1
I thought M.J.'s film was very odd as far as the content, but also very interesting. It was a film that made me think and really pay attention. It also was a good length for the content. In my opinion, most films with little content drag out and lose my attention, this film kept my attention and ended before it could lose it. I am stuck between two possible meanings behind the film, one being especially because of the way M.J. portrayed her, the "professional" was very uneasy about what the "amature" was going to do, so she just kept talking. The other is that it almost felt like an improved skit or like this "professional" was presenting the "amature" but not prepared. Also I thought her voice and the way she talked about the girl was almost maybe sarcasstic, like this was a practice skit and she was poking fun at something. I'm not sure which one is correct but I fell the film portrays one of these two interparations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Jillisa - Don't worry about interpretations being correct or not. The possible meanings you've identified here are thoughtful.
When you say "little content", what do you mean? What is your definition of content? Is it the same as plot/story?
when i say content i mean the story. some films (hollywood films) have really in depth plots and it takes a lot to get the idea across. in M.J.'s film it was just her responding to the girl in the tv she was holding. i'm not trying to say little content is bad, i sometimes like little content because it can make the rest of the film very well put together.
Post a Comment